<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAPTCHA farming</title>
	<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/</link>
	<description>It'll all be over in 60 days</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mhe</title>
		<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-8168</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-8168</guid>
					<description>what about using www.captchasolver.com to solve hard captchas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about using <a href="http://www.captchasolver.com" rel="nofollow">www.captchasolver.com</a> to solve hard captchas?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles</title>
		<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-647</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-647</guid>
					<description>Yerss.... though I also saw a number of user registrations from India, and the other day a *comprehensible* comment that was relevant to the topic from "paper shredders". Based in Pakistan, apparently.

(That one wasn't captcha'd.)

I think we could both be right - I'm watching a video from a Google session about captchas which does suggest the bouncing method you hinted at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yerss&#8230;. though I also saw a number of user registrations from India, and the other day a *comprehensible* comment that was relevant to the topic from &#8220;paper shredders&#8221;. Based in Pakistan, apparently.</p>
<p>(That one wasn&#8217;t captcha&#8217;d.)</p>
<p>I think we could both be right - I&#8217;m watching a video from a Google session about captchas which does suggest the bouncing method you hinted at.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nik</title>
		<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-597</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-597</guid>
					<description>Oh, the CAPTCHA is almost certainly being entered by a human.  I haven't seen much that suggests that OCR is being seriously used by spammers yet (although it's probably only a matter of time).

The IP address shows that the computer that posted the CAPTCHA results to you is (almost certainly) in India.  But that could easily just be a server that's hosting the code, and the person typing in the CAPTCHA details could be elsewhere.  For example, I'm typing this in the UK, but the computer it's going to be posted to is in the US.

Pretty tricky to tell one way or the other though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, the CAPTCHA is almost certainly being entered by a human.  I haven&#8217;t seen much that suggests that OCR is being seriously used by spammers yet (although it&#8217;s probably only a matter of time).</p>
<p>The IP address shows that the computer that posted the CAPTCHA results to you is (almost certainly) in India.  But that could easily just be a server that&#8217;s hosting the code, and the person typing in the CAPTCHA details could be elsewhere.  For example, I&#8217;m typing this in the UK, but the computer it&#8217;s going to be posted to is in the US.</p>
<p>Pretty tricky to tell one way or the other though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles</title>
		<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-594</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/11/21/captcha-farming/#comment-594</guid>
					<description>Except, as I pointed out, the captcha appears to have been filled in in India - at least, that's the IP address. Which makes me think it's almost certainly a human.

It could have been a fake, or an OCR, but I've also seen attempted  (or real) registrations from .in in the past couple of days - so I'm sticking with my hypothesis for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except, as I pointed out, the captcha appears to have been filled in in India - at least, that&#8217;s the IP address. Which makes me think it&#8217;s almost certainly a human.</p>
<p>It could have been a fake, or an OCR, but I&#8217;ve also seen attempted  (or real) registrations from .in in the past couple of days - so I&#8217;m sticking with my hypothesis for now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
