<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 55 of 60: Developer benchmarks (pt 1)</title>
	<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/09/02/day-55-of-60-developer-benchmarks-pt-1/</link>
	<description>It'll all be over in 60 days</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Try before you buy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Day 57 of 60: Developer benchmarks (pt 2)</title>
		<link>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/09/02/day-55-of-60-developer-benchmarks-pt-1/#comment-84</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/09/02/day-55-of-60-developer-benchmarks-pt-1/#comment-84</guid>
					<description>[...] As I explained on day 55, I&#8217;ve been comparing GCC and the Sun Studio compiler on Solaris, to GCC running on FreeBSD to see if there are any significant differences in the time taken to compile the applications, and if there is, whether that difference is reflected in the time taken by the applications to run. I used gcc 3.4.3 on both systems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As I explained on day 55, I&#8217;ve been comparing GCC and the Sun Studio compiler on Solaris, to GCC running on FreeBSD to see if there are any significant differences in the time taken to compile the applications, and if there is, whether that difference is reflected in the time taken by the applications to run. I used gcc 3.4.3 on both systems. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
