http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/ It'll all be over in 60 days Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:53:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/#comment-68 Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:41:48 +0000 http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/#comment-68 [...] You can verify this by looking at the results for test 20, which follow the same format as those for test 19. If you run those through ministat you’ll see no statistically significant differences for any of the results. [...] […] You can verify this by looking at the results for test 20, which follow the same format as those for test 19. If you run those through ministat you’ll see no statistically significant differences for any of the results. […]

]]> http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/#comment-62 Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:19:32 +0000 http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/#comment-62 Heh. No amulets here. Heh. No amulets here.

]]> http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/#comment-61 Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:06:14 +0000 http://jc.ngo.org.uk/blog/2006/08/16/day-38-of-60-multiple-queues-one-queue-runner/#comment-61 Hmmm, I'm going to have to read more carefully. I was convinced I was looking at nethack screens, not stats, for a moment. :-) Hmmm, I’m going to have to read more carefully. I was convinced I was looking at nethack screens, not stats, for a moment. :-)

]]>